Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Jubb vs Roberto Cid Subervi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Subervi analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Jubb vs Roberto Cid Subervi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jubb 0 - 0 Subervi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 52.64% of points on their second serve, while Subervi has won 49.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 54.28% of their opponent's second serve points, while Subervi has won 56.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.18% and 36.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 63.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Subervi has saved 52.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 69.62% of matches played (W/L 55/ 24), with Subervi winning 65.67% (W/L 44/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 122/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12), where as Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74% of matches (W/L 37/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.61 while Subervi has played against players with an average rank of 193.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Subervi has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 40.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Subervi has converted 46.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
308
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
428
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
70% (202-87)
Career Total W/L
57% (281-210)
70% (32-14)
YTD W/L
65% (24-13)
$54,540
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Jubb | Roberto Cid Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (32/14) | 65% (24/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (72/38) | 60% (51/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (592/474) | 55% (427/345) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (20/7) | 71% (12/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 63% (12/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 203 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 137 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:31 | 1:54:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 273.5 | 247.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (2108/3350) | 69% (1647/2403) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1512/2108) | 66% (1094/1647) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (651/1242) | 50% (375/756) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (157/391) | 46% (139/300) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1502/3563) | 44% (1080/2460) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (25/12) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 74% (17/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (31/45) | 65% (24/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (10/19) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (31/26) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (31/5) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (15/6) | 21% (14/3) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Michelsen
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Omar Jasika
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniil Glinka
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Altug Celikbilek
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Orel Kimhi
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Paul Jubb
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taha Baadi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jubb Vs Subervi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jubb are available here and Subervi photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Roberto Cid Subervi
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
